Guidance

Mission Physics

Mission Physics is the trust and stability layer for AI execution. It helps answer whether the work is ready to trust, what evidence supports it, where pressure is rising, and what still needs a human decision.

Guide summary

Use this page to understand the surface before you act inside it.

Use Mission Physics to read trust posture, evidence strength, risk pressure, artifact readiness, and human trust signals.

Guide type

Guidance

This guide reflects the current product workflow and surface ownership.

Sections

5

Summary first, then steps, mistakes, and recovery notes.

Related guides

3

Written against the current product structure and core execution workflow.

Main question

Can this work be trusted yet?

Mission Physics is designed to make that question operational.

Most visible signals

Mission Stability Score / Decision Pressure Map

Use them together instead of reading any one score in isolation.

Related action

Open Replay too

Replay explains what happened; Mission Physics explains how stable that work currently looks.

Guide section

What it is

Mission Physics is a premium trust layer for AI execution. It measures stability, evidence, risk, readiness, momentum, and human trust from durable run data.

When to use it

Use it during review, before shipping an artifact, after failures, or when operator disagreement needs a clearer signal.

Where to find it

Mission Physics surfaces linked to runs and replay.

What happens next

The scores and pressure items help you decide whether to continue, revise, approve, or escalate.

Common mistake

Treating a high score as permission to skip review.

Related action

Open Mission Replay alongside Mission Physics for the strongest trust read.

Guide section

Core signals

Mission Stability Score

The top-line trust posture for whether the run is stable enough to use with confidence.

Decision Pressure Map

Shows where unresolved pressure, disagreement, or review blockers still need human attention.

Evidence Strength

Measures how well claims and outcomes are supported by the run’s durable evidence posture.

Risk Pressure

Shows whether risk is increasing or unresolved inside the run.

Artifact Readiness

Helps answer whether the output is actually usable yet.

Human Trust

Reflects how much human intervention, challenge, or approval is still implied by the current posture.

Guide section

How it is influenced

  • Evidence notes and stronger references tend to improve evidence strength.
  • Risk flags and unresolved review challenges increase pressure.
  • Finalization and packaging signals improve artifact readiness when the rest of the run is healthy.
  • Approval requests indicate work that still needs human decision rather than silent trust.

Guide section

How it fits into the workflow

Mission Replay tells the story of what happened. Mission Physics tells you whether the current result looks stable enough to trust. Together they form the best explanation layer for reviewed AI work inside the product.

Does Mission Physics replace domain judgment?

No. It is an explainable operational instrument, not a substitute for human expertise or policy review.

What if data is missing?

The model should reduce certainty rather than pretending confidence exists where it does not.

Guide section

How to use it well

What it is

A decision-support layer, not a magic truth score.

When to use it

When trust, readiness, or disagreement matters to the decision.

Where to find it

Run and replay-adjacent trust surfaces.

What happens next

You decide whether to revise, approve, continue, or escalate.

Common mistake

Reading one metric without looking at replay or the underlying pressure items.

Related action

Use Mission Replay and the Run detail page as the supporting operational context.